<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Propagation of Error on Amit Rajan</title><link>https://amitrajan012.github.io/topics/propagation-of-error/</link><description>Recent content in Propagation of Error on Amit Rajan</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 03:08:14 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://amitrajan012.github.io/topics/propagation-of-error/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Measurement and Propagation of Error (Part 2)</title><link>https://amitrajan012.github.io/post/measurement-and-propagation-of-error_2/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 03:08:14 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://amitrajan012.github.io/post/measurement-and-propagation-of-error_2/</guid><description>&lt;/br&gt;&#10;#### Linear Combinations of Dependent Measurements :&#10;&lt;p&gt;In the case of dependent measurement, to quantify the uncertainty, we need to know the value of &lt;b&gt;covariance&lt;/b&gt; for all the possible pairs of measurements. This is practically not feasible. In this case, an upper bound can be placed on the uncertainty. If \(X_1, X_2, ..., X_n\) are \(n\) dependent measurements and \(c_1, c_2, ..., c_n\) are constants, then the uncertainty of \(c_1X_1 &amp;#43; c_2X_2 &amp;#43; ... &amp;#43; c_nX_n\) can be bounded as:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Measurement and Propagation of Error (Part 1)</title><link>https://amitrajan012.github.io/post/measurement-and-propagation-of-error/</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 02:18:29 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://amitrajan012.github.io/post/measurement-and-propagation-of-error/</guid><description>&lt;/br&gt;&#10;Any measurement in a scientific or an engineering process, consists of two error parts: &lt;b&gt;systematic error&lt;/b&gt; or &lt;b&gt;bias&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;random error&lt;/b&gt;. The bias is the part of the error that is same for every measurement. Random error varies from measurement to measurement and averages out to 0 in the long run. Hence, the measured value can be written as:&#10;\[Measured \ Value = True \ Value &amp;#43; Bias &amp;#43; Random \ Error\]&lt;p&gt;The &lt;b&gt;mean&lt;/b&gt; \(\mu\) of the population represents the part of the measurement that is the same for every measurement. Hence, \(\mu\) is the &lt;b&gt;sum of the true value and the bias&lt;/b&gt;. The smaller the bias, the more accurate the measuring process is. If the mean is equal to the true value, the measuring process is said to be &lt;b&gt;unbiased&lt;/b&gt;. The &lt;b&gt;standard deviation&lt;/b&gt; \(\sigma\) of the population is the the standard deviation of the random error. The &lt;b&gt;precision&lt;/b&gt; of the measurement is determined by the standard deviation of the measurement process. The smaller the value of \(\sigma\), the more precise the process. \(\sigma\) is often referred to as the &lt;b&gt;uncertainty&lt;/b&gt; in the measuring process.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>